exactly that

Glamour, in response to the thunderous applause they received for the photos of Lizzie Miller, seems to be putting out a calendar using this photo of some “plus-sized” women:

Seven nude women, one black, and the others of unidentifiable race/ethnicity.

I will give the criticism where it is due. I am irked that these women are considered “plus sized”, because I think that they are probably closer to the representation of the average size of women than the majority of cover models that we see. They are certainly not what I am going to say “normal” or “average”, because I have learned in the last years that these labels have just as much harm as they have the intended good that people try to put behind them. Maybe more. Also, if this photo is trying to be representative of diversity, it does fail to hit that mark in its exclusion of differently abled bodies. I am not surprised by these oversights. I don’t want anyone storming down into my comment demanding that the fashion industry as a whole eat a sandwich…

One critique that I did find that I want to expand upon was over at Renee’s blog:

They have one Black woman in this photo spread, sporting straightened hair and she represents their attempt at inclusivity.  Putting one Black woman in amongst a crowd of White women, only serves to other and create her as exotic.   News Flash:  There is more to WOC than Black women.  I suppose all of the first nations and Asian women were in hiding and steadfastly refused to pose the day this image was taken.   Diversity means adding various WOC instead of promoting the White women as the representative of beauty.

With no disrespect to Renee, because I do have a lot of respect for her: This photo is definitely heavy on the light skin and blonde hair collective, that is for sure. And I am going to say, yes, I would like to see more brown, red, and other bodies represented in mainstream modeling. Something, however, always irks me when this type of narrative comes up. We don’t know, in today’s world, by looking at a photo or representation of a person what their racial or ethnic identity is. I can only speak from a USian perspective, but our country has had a great and proud history of whitewashing people’s heritage. Native American and First Nation tribes have had their people systematically married off with white folk, either to civilize them or make them more religiously appropriate, to the point where there are almost no blood lines that are not at least half European anymore. In other words, you won’t know by looking at a person if they are in fact Native. There is a damn good reason why many people who identify as Native or who have the government sanctioned appropriate amount of Native blood in their veins might look European. I am not going to get into all of them, again. I’m tired. I’ll give you all a moment to work that one out for yourselves.

I feel that I know what point Renee was trying to make (without saying “what she meant to say” because I would never presume to do so), that it would be nice if we had more people in mainstream modeling who looked more obviously like stereotypical representations of different racial groups. Some color would be nice. But I can’t even say I agree with that, because I have such a hard time agreeing that someone needs to look X in order to represent it. Being bi-racial or mixed race is such a hard thing to be, because you never quite feel like you belong in any one group, and no one else is really like you, so who do you belong to? We all talk about how we want to see someone who looks like us represented on the television, but for most mixed race people, there isn’t anyone. If we embrace one aspect of it, we don’t look Native enough, or they don’t look the right kind of Asian, her eyes aren’t slanted enough, or his features are too European, or they are too white…

Race isn’t just black and white, brown, red, or yellow. Mostly it is a spectrum and everything in between now — especially in melting pot areas like North America. Honestly I can’t get into some of this anymore without feeling dismissed. I want to discuss race issues, and be open to these kinds of dialogue… but every time I feel like my own personal identity is fading into the background. I too want to see more representations of people of color, especially WoC, but I get hesitant to bring up the lack because I don’t want to assume that everyone who isn’t obviously First Nation or Latin@ or Asian is white. I don’t want to inflict that hurt of erasure on other people that I feel every damn time race comes up in Bloglandia.

Incidentally, one of the women in that photograph looks an awful lot like me. Enough that she could be related to me, on my mother’s side.

Comments on: "What Pictures Can’t Tell You…" (11)

  1. totally off topic (to a really terrific post) but there is an Ikea (now that I have embraced my heritage) by my house and I would me more than happy to pick up a rocking moose and send it to DA UP
    I know that was not the intent of your comment but I would love to get the kids something if that is what you think they would like.
    Drop me an email and let me know.

  2. Thank you! My native ancestry is distant, though looking at my maternal grandfather, it is also fairly obvious. Looking at the picture, I’m surprised by how few of the women are blond, and by the hints of various racial or ethnic origins outside the strictly European framework — though as you say, you can’t tell a person’s bloodline from a picture anymore. I too would love to see more representation across the board ethnically, size-ishly, abled-bodiedly, etc. (also urgh, linguistically). I hope that there is room for more discussion of inclusion that doesn’t seek to reduce everything to binary terms and instead defines representation across a spectrum.

  3. “We don’t know, in today’s world, by looking at a photo or representation of a person what their racial or ethnic identity is.”

    EXACTLY!

    When I read this on Renee’s blog I was like uh-oh, here we go again looking at skin color when many women of color are light skinned. Its not a black and white world – and I really want people who are discussing race to know this. It only perpetuates this Black and White world which is mixing and meshing as we speak. Embracing diversity is also embracing diversity of mixed peoples. Which often many assume these people are “white.” For instance, my Aunt is half but has blonde hair and blue eyes. This does not make her any less Black to be light skinned. Nor does it make you or I any less Native to be lighter skin toned.

    I really want to say this because I am very tired of the Black and White argument around race. White is insulting to some as well. I am Native and European. My Mother does not identify with White as that is a color of a wall. She identifies with her Scandinavian heritage and has every darn right too. She has a fabulous t-shirt she got in Norway that says “Scandinavian Heritage” to celebrate her culture and pride. Please know that there are many people that embrace their culture who do not identify as White. Oppression is layer deep as well. It was not long that my Grandfather on my Mothers side went hungry and was abandoned by his family as a young child. This is also generational trauma. I have a right to claim this part of my heritage and claim it as my story. I have a right to heal this and to not be dissected in my existence. I am sick of it. I just needed to speak of this.

    Great post friend!!!

  4. I’ve always been a fan of plus-size models! There’s a great site with many images of plus-size models here:

    http://www.judgmentofparis.com/

    They’re all gorgeous.

    The site’s forum also has thought-provoking discussions about body image and the media.

  5. dorktastic said:

    This is such an interesting post. My mixed-race ex is read as white, totally erasing his First Nations heritage (and leading to some very uncomfortable moments when he has presented his status card.
    I will admit that my firs thought when I looked at this picture after reading your comments was that there were a number of women in that picture that I read as racially “ambiguous” – and then it occurred to me that I was totally missing the point. I have met blond mixed race people, mixed race people with skin that is as light as my (very) pale white skin, and white people with darker, olive skin.
    I also agree with your frustration that these women are considered “plus-size” models. Maybe they do wear plus sizes, but that doesn’t mean that they’re fat. At my largest, I didn’t wear plus sizes because of my body shape/fat distribution, but was definitely outside of the socially approved range of body sizes for women. And, at least from that photograph, most of those women look like they fit within that range, or come pretty close. Sure, maybe some of them wear a size 14, but that looks different on a woman who is 5’8 + (I’m assuming they’re tall because they are models), than it would on my 5’3 body. Clothing size, like body weight, doesn’t necessarily tell you very much about what someone actually looks like.

    (Also, size 14 according to whom? I currently have clothes that fit in women’s sizes 5-10 – women’s sizes are not standardized at all!).

  6. […] women meant to make me hate myself so that I would work to not be like them. There was no campaign of women of any size coming out to say “we are imperfect, but here we […]

  7. […] were willing to toss him aside for someone who looked closer. Fair enough, sure, because nowadays, you really can’t tell if someone is truly Native (or any ethnicity) just by looking at them. But the makers of the Twilight Saga movies sure as hell were not hopelessly devoted to the idea of […]

Leave a comment